DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
JR]
Docket No. 1199-12
1 November 2012
CJ
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 25 October 2012. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of
this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of your. application, together with all material
submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that your application was not timely filed,
and that you have not demonstrated that it would be in the interest
of justice for the Board to excuse your failure to submit your
application in a timely manner. As indicated in your application,
you knew of the alleged errors in 1994, when the Department of
Veterans Affairs denied your request for service connection for
an eyebrow scar and an undocumented buttock injury.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. Inthis regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
leven
(jo OBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 08393 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 October 2012. As you have not demonstrated that you were entitled to a disability rating of 30% or higher from the Department of the Navy as of 24 February 1993, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 01614 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 December 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 03451-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 September 2012. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06563 11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 October 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 01369 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 December 2012. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 00595 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 October 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board noted that although you claim you discovered the alleged error or injustice on 1 August 2001, you knew on 11 March 1991 that you were...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 09513 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 October 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 03752-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 January 2012. The Board noted that applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reentry code to individuals who are separated due to erroneous enlistment based on medical conditions that existed prior to entry into the service. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4531 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in “support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the .existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05291-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 September 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...